Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MINT vs XLC: how they differ
MINT and XLC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MINT returned more over the year.
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MINT and XLC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MINT | Only in XLC |
|---|---|
| United States Treasury 6.51% | META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 18.92% |
| Fannie Mae 1.18% | ALPHABET INC CL A 10.12% |
| Freddie Mac 1.04% | ALPHABET INC CL C 8.10% |
| SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91% | AT+T INC 5.19% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81% | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 5.03% |
| AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81% | WALT DISNEY CO/THE 4.76% |
| Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75% | WARNER BROS DISCOVERY INC 4.61% |
| INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73% | COMCAST CORP CLASS A 4.61% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund | XLC State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | PIMCO | State Street |
| What it is | Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad | Communication services |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.4% | −2.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.1 pts | −19.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 9.7% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 977 | 26 |
MINT in plain words
MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.
XLC in plain words
XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 70.4%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MINT or XLC?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.4% and XLC returned −2.0%, so MINT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MINT or XLC?
- MINT charges 0.36% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MINT and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 10% of MINT and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MINT against XLC, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-xlc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources