Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MINT vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to VHT's +25.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MINT and VHT

Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $19.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Health Care ETF.

At a glance
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
+25.0%
VHT total return, 1 year
0.36%
MINT expense ratio
0.09%
VHT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VHT costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.8 points.

MINT vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMINTVHT
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.2%+25.0%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.36%0.09%
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and VHT as of Sep 30, 2026$16.4bn$19.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight86%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund51.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and VHT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MINT VHT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Only in VHT
Eli Lilly & Co 12.95%
Johnson & Johnson 8.79%
AbbVie Inc 6.46%
Merck & Co Inc 5.02%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 4.66%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.51%
Amgen Inc 3.18%
Gilead Sciences Inc 2.59%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Health Care
Total return, 1 year +4.2% +25.0%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +25.4% (FHLC)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.4 pts vs FHLC
Expense ratio 0.36% 0.09%
Holdings 977 414
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and VHT as of Sep 30, 2026 $16.4bn $19.1bn

MINT and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

VHT

VHT tracks an index of Health Care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +25.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 414 positions, with the top ten at 51.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or VHT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and VHT +25.0%.
Which is cheaper, MINT or VHT?
VHT is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MINT against VHT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-vht

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.