Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PULS vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to VHT's +25.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PULS and VHT
Net assets: $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF, and $19.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Health Care ETF.
Pair scorecard
VHT costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.0 points.
| Measure | PULS | VHT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +25.0% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50 |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 and VHT as of Sep 30, 2026 | $19.8bn | $19.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 86% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 51.8% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PULS and VHT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PULS and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
VHT
VHT tracks an index of Health Care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +25.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 414 positions, with the top ten at 51.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PULS or VHT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and VHT +25.0%.
- Which is cheaper, PULS or VHT?
- VHT is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PULS against VHT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vht
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PULS against VHT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vht
[PULS against VHT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-vht)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.