Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MINT vs SGOV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to SGOV's +3.7%, and SGOV charges 0.09% to MINT's 0.36%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MINT and SGOVNet assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $117.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
SGOV costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points.
| Measure | MINT | SGOV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.2% | +3.7% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and SGOV as of Oct 27, 2026 | $16.4bn | $117.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jun 5, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 333 weekly returnsMINT returned slightly more: +22.0% to +20.8%. SGOV swung less: 0.3% to 0.6%. SGOV fell less at its worst: 0.0% to −2.4%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MINT | SGOV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +22.0% | +20.8% | MINT (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +3.2% | +3.0% | MINT (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −0.5% | +0.6% | SGOV | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 0.6% | 0.3% | SGOV | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 0.5% | 0.2% | SGOV | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −2.4% | 0.0% | SGOV | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.04 | −0.46 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.05 | −0.57 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 1.32 | Not measured | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 333 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
MINT and SGOV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MINT and SGOV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. MINT follows No index, actively managed and SGOV follows ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index.
- Number of holdings. MINT holds 977 positions and SGOV holds 22.
- Cost. MINT charges 0.36% of assets a year and SGOV 0.09%, a gap of 0.27 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
SGOV
SGOV tracks an index of 0-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MINT or SGOV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and SGOV +3.7%.
- Which is cheaper, MINT or SGOV?
- SGOV is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MINT against SGOV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-sgov
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MINT against SGOV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-sgov
[MINT against SGOV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-sgov)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.