Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MINT vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to SHV's +3.6%, and SHV charges 0.15% to MINT's 0.36%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MINT and SHV
Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $21.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
SHV costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points.
| Measure | MINT | SHV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.2% | +3.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and SHV as of Oct 27, 2026 | $16.4bn | $21.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 27, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 882 weekly returnsMINT returned more: +42.4% to +26.9%. SHV swung less: 0.3% to 1.1%. SHV fell less at its worst: −0.4% to −4.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MINT | SHV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +42.4% | +26.9% | MINT | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.1% | +1.4% | MINT | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +0.5% | +0.1% | MINT | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 1.1% | 0.3% | SHV | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 1.0% | 0.2% | SHV | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −4.6% | −0.4% | SHV | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.50 | −0.41 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.59 | −0.64 | MINT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.46 | 3.65 | SHV | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 882 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
MINT and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MINT and SHV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. MINT follows No index, actively managed and SHV follows ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index.
- Number of holdings. MINT holds 977 positions and SHV holds 66.
- Cost. MINT charges 0.36% of assets a year and SHV 0.15%, a gap of 0.21 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
SHV
SHV tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MINT or SHV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and SHV +3.6%.
- Which is cheaper, MINT or SHV?
- SHV is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MINT against SHV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-shv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MINT against SHV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-shv
[MINT against SHV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-shv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.