MAGS vs PABU: Differences, Returns & Fees

MAGS and PABU hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned +12.2% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $5.7bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and $2.5bn for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about MAGS and PABU

Answers cite the figures on this page.

PABU costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.0 points; MAGS is 2.3 times larger.

MAGS vs PABU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MAGSPABU
Expense ratio0.30%0.10%
Net assets$5.7bn$2.5bn
Total return, 1 year+12.2%+10.2%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index
Holdings in common20%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.3%48.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.

+12.2%
MAGS total return, 1 year
+10.2%
PABU total return, 1 year
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio
0.10%
PABU expense ratio

Get MAGS and PABU fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and PABU hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.

half

20% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding MAGS PABU
NVIDIA Corp 3.52% 9.40%
Apple Inc 3.49% 7.68%
Tesla Inc 3.45% 3.28%
Microsoft Corp 3.07% 8.08%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04% 2.53%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48% 1.90%
Alphabet Inc 2.45% 1.74%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
Only in PABU
ALPHABET CLASS C 3.86%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.78%
ELI LILLY 3.46%
BROADCOM INC 3.28%
SNOWFLAKE 3.11%
SERVICENOW 2.94%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY 2.86%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES 2.35%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
PABU
iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +12.2% +10.2%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +15.4% (PBUS)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −5.1 pts vs PBUS
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.10%
Already in the S&P 500 22.5% 97.3%
Holdings 8 88
Net assets $5.7bn $2.5bn

MAGS and PABU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%.

About PABU

PABU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +10.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 88 positions, with the top ten at 48.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or PABU?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +12.2% and PABU +10.2%.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or PABU?
PABU is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MAGS and PABU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of MAGS and 97% of PABU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MAGS against PABU, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-pabu

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.