A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

LRGF vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees

LRGF and MTUM hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned +25.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $3.8bn for iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF and $20.3bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

LRGF costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.3 points; MTUM is 5.4 times larger.

LRGF vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
LRGFMTUM
Expense ratio0.08%0.15%
Net assets$3.8bn$20.3bn
Total return, 1 year+16.5%+25.8%
What it tracksSTOXX U.S. Equity Factor IndexMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Holdings in common24%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.6%36.1%
Below its high7.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+16.5%
LRGF total return, 1 year
+25.8%
MTUM total return, 1 year
0.08%
LRGF expense ratio
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LRGF and MTUM hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

24% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding LRGF MTUM
ALPHABET CLASS C 3.93% 2.12%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.43% 5.19%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.13% 6.16%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.13% 3.14%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.00% 2.60%
LAM RESEARCH 0.78% 2.34%
ALPHABET CLASS A 0.72% 2.69%
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP 0.92% 0.66%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.61% 3.63%
MARATHON PETROLEUM 0.58% 1.22%
CHEVRON 0.56% 1.43%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.54% 3.03%
Only in LRGF
NVIDIA 7.58%
APPLE 6.76%
MICROSOFT 5.35%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.21%
BROADCOM INC 2.58%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.08%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.44%
VISA CLASS A 1.27%
Only in MTUM
TEXAS INSTRUMENT INC 1.23%
UNION PACIFIC 0.90%
WELLTOWER 0.89%
PHILLIPS 66 0.74%
DATADOG INC CLASS A 0.71%
QUANTA SERVICES INC 0.63%
CSX 0.61%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 0.60%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

LRGF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares iShares
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year +16.5% +25.8%
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 88.8% 93.2%
Holdings 302 126
Net assets $3.8bn $20.3bn

LRGF and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About LRGF

LRGF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 302 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%.

About MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +25.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LRGF or MTUM?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LRGF returned +16.5% and MTUM +25.8%.
Which is cheaper, LRGF or MTUM?
LRGF is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do LRGF and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 89% of LRGF and 93% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
LRGF vs SPMOCGDV vs LRGFLRGF vs OEFDFUS vs LRGFMTUM vs USCAMSLC vs MTUMMTUM vs SUSAMTUM vs PTLC
LRGF on its own →MTUM on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
LRGF and MTUM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗LRGF and MTUM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for LRGF ↗iShares page for MTUM ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, LRGF against MTUM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lrgf-vs-mtum

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.