JPST vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

JPST's duration was 0.8 years on May 31, 2026 and VUSB's 1.0 on Jun 30, 2026; VUSB charges 0.10% to JPST's 0.18%. Net assets: $42.8bn on Oct 20, 2026 for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF, and $9.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about JPST and VUSB

Answers cite the figures on this page.

VUSB costs 0.08 points a year less; both returned +3.4% over a year.

JPST vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
JPSTVUSB
Expense ratio0.18%0.10%
Net assets, JPST as of Oct 20, 2026 and VUSB as of Sep 30, 2026$42.8bn$9.9bn
Total return, 1 year+3.4%+3.4%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

+3.4%
JPST total return, 1 year
+3.4%
VUSB total return, 1 year
0.18%
JPST expense ratio
0.10%
VUSB expense ratio

Get JPST's fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-731F3E8DEA

JPST and VUSB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Size. JPST has $42.8bn in net assets and VUSB $9.9bn (net assets, JPST as of Oct 20, 2026 and VUSB as of Sep 30, 2026); JPST is 4.3 times larger.
  2. What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 JPST returned +3.4% and VUSB +3.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.0 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
VUSB
Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +3.4% +3.4%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.9% (AGG) −1.9% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark +5.4 pts vs AGG +5.3 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.10%
Holdings 824 1344
Net assets, JPST as of Oct 20, 2026 and VUSB as of Sep 30, 2026 $42.8bn $9.9bn

JPST and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About JPST

JPST is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.

About VUSB

VUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, JPST or VUSB?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JPST returned +3.4% and VUSB +3.4%.
Which is cheaper, JPST or VUSB?
VUSB is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JPST against VUSB, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jpst-vs-vusb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.