JPST vs TBLL: Differences, Returns & Fees
On May 31, 2026 JPST's duration was 0.8 years and TBLL's 0.3; TBLL charges 0.08% to JPST's 0.18%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $42.8bn for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF and $2.6bn for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF.
TBLL costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; JPST is 16.2 times larger.
| JPST | TBLL | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Net assets | $42.8bn | $2.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.4% | +3.6% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index |
| Holdings in common | 1% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.
JPST and TBLL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. JPST follows No index, actively managed and TBLL follows ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index.
- Holdings in common. 1% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026).
- Number of holdings. JPST holds 824 positions and TBLL holds 93.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JPST and TBLL hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
half
1% in common
On the same fields
JPST and TBLL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About JPST
JPST is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.
About TBLL
TBLL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +3.6% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, JPST or TBLL?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JPST returned +3.4% and TBLL +3.6%.
- Which is cheaper, JPST or TBLL?
- TBLL is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JPST against TBLL, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jpst-vs-tbll
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). JPST against TBLL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jpst-vs-tbll
[JPST against TBLL (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jpst-vs-tbll)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.