IWV vs QDPL: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWV and QDPL hold 85% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $20.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 3000 ETF, and $1.8bn on Oct 2, 2026 for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF.

IWV costs 0.40 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; IWV is 11.1 times larger.

IWV vs QDPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWVQDPL
Expense ratio0.20%0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 2, 2026$20.4bn$1.8bn
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+16.3%
What it tracksRussell 3000 IndexMetaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index Series 400
Holdings in common85%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.7%34.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
+16.3%
QDPL total return, 1 year
0.20%
IWV expense ratio
0.60%
QDPL expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWV and QDPL hold 85% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

85% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWV QDPL
NVIDIA 7.15% 6.87%
APPLE 6.51% 6.41%
MICROSOFT 5.32% 4.88%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.40% 3.75%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.74% 2.95%
BROADCOM INC 2.25% 2.60%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.21% 2.38%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.11% 1.73%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.55% 1.31%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.28% 1.32%
ELI LILLY 1.26% 1.28%
TESLA INC 1.49% 1.24%
Only in IWV
SNOWFLAKE 0.17%
CLOUDFLARE CLASS A 0.15%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 0.13%
SPOTIFY TECHNOLOGY 0.11%
BLOOM ENERGY CLASS A 0.10%
CHENIERE ENERGY 0.08%
ASTERA LABS 0.07%
NATERA 0.07%
Only in QDPL
US TREASURY N/B 0.88%
US TREASURY N/B 0.85%
US TREASURY N/B 0.83%
US TREASURY N/B 0.82%
US TREASURY N/B 0.82%
US TREASURY N/B 0.82%
US TREASURY N/B 0.81%
US TREASURY N/B 0.81%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares Pacer
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.7% +16.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VTHR) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTHR not available
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.60%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 89.9%
Holdings 2600 513
Net assets, IWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and QDPL as of Oct 2, 2026 $20.6bn $1.8bn

IWV and QDPL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

About QDPL

QDPL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 513 positions, with the top ten at 34.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWV or QDPL?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWV returned +16.7% and QDPL +16.3%.
Which is cheaper, IWV or QDPL?
IWV is cheaper, by 0.40 percentage points a year. That is about $40 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWV and QDPL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of IWV and 90% of QDPL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWV against QDPL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwv-vs-qdpl

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.