IWS vs NOBL: how they differ
IWS and NOBL hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and IWS returned +20.2% over the year. iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
IWS costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.4 points; IWS is 1.4 times larger.
| IWS | NOBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.23% | 0.35% |
| Net assets | $15.3bn | $11.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.2% | +9.8% |
| Holdings in common | 8% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 7.0% | 16.7% |
| Below its high | 4.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 6.3%, high on Aug 24, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWS and NOBL hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
8% in common
On the same fields
IWS and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWS in plain words
IWS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 66% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 719 positions, with the top ten at 7.0%. It sat 4.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
NOBL in plain words
NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWS or NOBL?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWS returned +20.2% and NOBL +9.8%.
- Which is cheaper, IWS or NOBL?
- IWS is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $12. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, IWS against NOBL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iws-vs-nobl
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IWS against NOBL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iws-vs-nobl
[IWS against NOBL (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iws-vs-nobl)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.