Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
COWZ vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to NOBL's +15.5%; 11% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWZ and NOBL
Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
Pair scorecard
NOBL costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.9 points; COWZ is 1.7 times larger.
| Measure | COWZ | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.4% | +15.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $19.5bn | $11.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 11% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | 17.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Dec 30, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 512 weekly returnsCOWZ returned more: +251.9% to +165.9%. NOBL swung less: 16.5% to 19.6%. NOBL fell less at its worst: −31.7% to −36.3%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | COWZ | NOBL | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +251.9% | +165.9% | COWZ | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.6% | +10.4% | COWZ | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +188.5% | +116.4% | COWZ | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 19.6% | 16.5% | NOBL | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.8% | 11.7% | NOBL | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −36.3% | −31.7% | NOBL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.62 | 0.53 | COWZ | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.89 | 0.75 | COWZ | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.38 | 0.33 | COWZ | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 512 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and NOBL hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
11% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWZ and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ and NOBL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. COWZ follows Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index and NOBL follows S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index.
- Holdings in common. 11% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 COWZ returned +24.4% and NOBL +15.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.9 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
COWZ
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
NOBL
NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or NOBL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and NOBL +15.5%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or NOBL?
- NOBL is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWZ against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-nobl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). COWZ against NOBL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-nobl
[COWZ against NOBL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-nobl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.