COWZ vs IJJ: how they differ

COWZ and IJJ hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned +22.9% over the year. Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF.

IJJ costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.4 points; COWZ is 2.2 times larger.

COWZIJJ
Expense ratio0.49%0.18%
Net assets, COWZ as of Jul 31, 2026 and IJJ as of Oct 9, 2026$18.7bn$8.4bn
Total return, 1 year+22.9%+10.5%
Holdings in common1%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%11.0%
Below its high5.1%, high on Sep 3, 20267.1%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+22.9%
COWZ total return, 1 year
+10.5%
IJJ total return, 1 year
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio
0.18%
IJJ expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and IJJ hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

1% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding COWZ IJJ
Ovintiv Inc 0.56% 1.06%
TD SYNNEX Corp 0.35% 1.30%
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Only in IJJ
US FOODS HOLDING 1.27%
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM 1.23%
PERMIAN RESOURCES CLASS A 1.16%
HF SINCLAIR 1.13%
WESCO INTERNATIONAL 1.05%
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA 1.01%
SHARKNINJA 0.93%
PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP 0.91%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
IJJ
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Pacer iShares
What it is Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100 Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +22.9% +10.5%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +5.6 pts −6.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 94.7% 0.0%
Holdings 100 303
Net assets, COWZ as of Jul 31, 2026 and IJJ as of Oct 9, 2026 $18.7bn $8.4bn

COWZ and IJJ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COWZ in plain words

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

IJJ in plain words

IJJ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 303 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or IJJ?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +22.9% and IJJ +10.5%.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or IJJ?
IJJ is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $31. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and IJJ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of COWZ and 0% of IJJ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, COWZ against IJJ, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-ijj

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.