COWZ vs EMLP: how they differ
COWZ and EMLP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned +22.9% over the year. Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund.
COWZ costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.1 points; COWZ is 4.6 times larger.
| COWZ | EMLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.95% |
| Net assets, COWZ as of Jul 31, 2026 and EMLP as of Oct 9, 2026 | $18.7bn | $4.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.9% | +14.8% |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | 42.7% |
| Below its high | 5.1%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | 4.8%, high on Jul 23, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and EMLP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
COWZ and EMLP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ in plain words
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
EMLP in plain words
EMLP is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 58 positions, with the top ten at 42.7%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Jul 23, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or EMLP?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +22.9% and EMLP +14.8%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or EMLP?
- COWZ is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $46. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, COWZ against EMLP, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-emlp
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). COWZ against EMLP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-emlp
[COWZ against EMLP (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-emlp)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.