EMLP vs IJJ: how they differ
EMLP and IJJ hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and EMLP returned +14.8% over the year. First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund and iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF.
IJJ costs 0.77 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.3 points; IJJ is 2.1 times larger.
| EMLP | IJJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.18% |
| Net assets | $4.1bn | $8.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +10.5% |
| Holdings in common | 2% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.7% | 11.0% |
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Jul 23, 2026 | 7.1%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EMLP and IJJ hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
2% in common
On the same fields
EMLP and IJJ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EMLP in plain words
EMLP is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 58 positions, with the top ten at 42.7%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Jul 23, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
IJJ in plain words
IJJ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 303 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EMLP or IJJ?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMLP returned +14.8% and IJJ +10.5%.
- Which is cheaper, EMLP or IJJ?
- IJJ is cheaper, by 0.77 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $77. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, EMLP against IJJ, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emlp-vs-ijj
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). EMLP against IJJ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emlp-vs-ijj
[EMLP against IJJ (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emlp-vs-ijj)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.