EMLP vs VFLO: how they differ

EMLP and VFLO hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VFLO returned +42.3% over the year. First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF.

VFLO costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 27.5 points; VFLO is 1.9 times larger.

EMLPVFLO
Expense ratio0.95%0.39%
Net assets, EMLP as of Oct 9, 2026 and VFLO as of Jun 30, 2026$4.1bn$7.8bn
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+42.3%
Holdings in common0%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.7%30.8%
Below its high4.8%, high on Jul 23, 20265.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+14.8%
EMLP total return, 1 year
+42.3%
VFLO total return, 1 year
0.95%
EMLP expense ratio
0.39%
VFLO expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMLP and VFLO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding EMLP VFLO
Vistra Corp. 0.27% 1.67%
Only in EMLP
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. 8.62%
Energy Transfer LP 7.58%
MPLX LP 4.26%
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (Class A) 3.91%
Kinder Morgan, Inc. 3.88%
National Fuel Gas Company 3.88%
PPL Corporation 2.88%
The Southern Company 2.83%
Only in VFLO
DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION 3.49%
EXPEDIA GROUP, INC. 3.41%
ADOBE INC. 3.37%
SANDISK CORPORATION 3.02%
COEUR MINING, INC. 3.02%
NEWMONT CORPORATION 3.01%
MERCK & CO., INC. 2.98%
SALESFORCE, INC. 2.90%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
VFLO
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +14.8% +42.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −2.5 pts +25.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.39%
Already in the S&P 500 42.9% 83.8%
Holdings 58 50
Net assets, EMLP as of Oct 9, 2026 and VFLO as of Jun 30, 2026 $4.1bn $7.8bn

EMLP and VFLO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

EMLP in plain words

EMLP is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 58 positions, with the top ten at 42.7%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Jul 23, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

VFLO in plain words

VFLO tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +42.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMLP or VFLO?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMLP returned +14.8% and VFLO +42.3%.
Which is cheaper, EMLP or VFLO?
VFLO is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $56. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EMLP and VFLO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 43% of EMLP and 84% of VFLO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, EMLP against VFLO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emlp-vs-vflo

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.