EMLP vs NOBL: how they differ

EMLP and NOBL hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and EMLP returned +14.8% over the year. First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

NOBL costs 0.60 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.0 points; NOBL is 2.8 times larger.

EMLPNOBL
Expense ratio0.95%0.35%
Net assets$4.1bn$11.2bn
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+9.8%
Holdings in common3%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.7%16.7%
Below its high4.8%, high on Jul 23, 20266.3%, high on Aug 24, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+14.8%
EMLP total return, 1 year
+9.8%
NOBL total return, 1 year
0.95%
EMLP expense ratio
0.35%
NOBL expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMLP and NOBL hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

3% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding EMLP NOBL
Atmos Energy Corporation 1.29% 1.34%
NextEra Energy, Inc. 1.57% 1.28%
Only in EMLP
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. 8.62%
Energy Transfer LP 7.58%
MPLX LP 4.26%
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (Class A) 3.91%
Kinder Morgan, Inc. 3.88%
National Fuel Gas Company 3.88%
PPL Corporation 2.88%
The Southern Company 2.83%
Only in NOBL
BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.78%
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC 1.73%
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 1.71%
NORDSON CORP 1.67%
FASTENAL CO 1.66%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 1.65%
TARGET CORP 1.65%
CHEVRON CORP 1.63%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year +14.8% +9.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −2.5 pts −7.4 pts
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 42.9% 99.7%
Holdings 58 69
Net assets $4.1bn $11.2bn

EMLP and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

EMLP in plain words

EMLP is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 58 positions, with the top ten at 42.7%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Jul 23, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

NOBL in plain words

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMLP or NOBL?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMLP returned +14.8% and NOBL +9.8%.
Which is cheaper, EMLP or NOBL?
NOBL is cheaper, by 0.60 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $60. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EMLP and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 43% of EMLP and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, EMLP against NOBL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emlp-vs-nobl

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.