A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

MDYV vs NOBL: how they differ

MDYV and NOBL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MDYV returned +10.4% over the year. State Street SPDR S & P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

MDYV costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points; NOBL is 4.1 times larger.

MDYVNOBL
Expense ratio0.15%0.35%
Net assets, MDYV as of Oct 8, 2026 and NOBL as of Oct 9, 2026$2.7bn$11.2bn
Total return, 1 year+10.4%+9.8%
Holdings in common0%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund11.0%16.7%
Below its high7.1%, high on Aug 14, 20266.3%, high on Aug 24, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+10.4%
MDYV total return, 1 year
+9.8%
NOBL total return, 1 year
0.15%
MDYV expense ratio
0.35%
NOBL expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MDYV and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding MDYV NOBL
Only in MDYV
TD SYNNEX CORP 1.30%
US FOODS HOLDING CORP 1.27%
RELIANCE INC 1.23%
PERMIAN RESOURCES CORP CL A 1.16%
HF SINCLAIR CORP 1.13%
OVINTIV INC 1.06%
WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC 1.05%
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA 1.01%
Only in NOBL
BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.78%
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC 1.73%
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 1.71%
NORDSON CORP 1.67%
FASTENAL CO 1.66%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 1.65%
TARGET CORP 1.65%
CHEVRON CORP 1.63%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

MDYV
State Street SPDR S & P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer State Street ProShares
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year +10.4% +9.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −6.9 pts −7.4 pts
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 99.7%
Holdings 296 69
Net assets, MDYV as of Oct 8, 2026 and NOBL as of Oct 9, 2026 $2.7bn $11.2bn

MDYV and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MDYV in plain words

MDYV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 296 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

NOBL in plain words

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MDYV or NOBL?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MDYV returned +10.4% and NOBL +9.8%.
Which is cheaper, MDYV or NOBL?
MDYV is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $20. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MDYV and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of MDYV and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
MDYV vs PKWMDYV vs REGLMDYV vs RPVDHS vs MDYVDHS vs NOBLFTXR vs NOBLNOBL vs WTVEMLP vs NOBL
MDYV on its own →NOBL on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
MDYV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗MDYV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗State Street website ↗NOBL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗NOBL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗ProShares page for NOBL ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, MDYV against NOBL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mdyv-vs-nobl

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.