MDYV vs RPV: how they differ
MDYV and RPV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and RPV returned +22.2% over the year. State Street SPDR S & P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF.
MDYV costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.8 points; MDYV is 1.6 times larger.
| MDYV | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, MDYV as of Oct 8, 2026 and RPV as of Oct 9, 2026 | $2.7bn | $1.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.4% | +22.2% |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 11.0% | 22.6% |
| Below its high | 7.1%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 4.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MDYV and RPV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
MDYV and RPV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MDYV in plain words
MDYV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 296 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
RPV in plain words
RPV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 120 positions, with the top ten at 22.6%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MDYV or RPV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MDYV returned +10.4% and RPV +22.2%.
- Which is cheaper, MDYV or RPV?
- MDYV is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $20. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, MDYV against RPV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mdyv-vs-rpv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). MDYV against RPV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mdyv-vs-rpv
[MDYV against RPV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mdyv-vs-rpv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.