COWZ vs WTV: how they differ
COWZ and WTV hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned +22.9% over the year. Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund.
WTV costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.7 points; COWZ is 6.3 times larger.
| COWZ | WTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.12% |
| Net assets, COWZ as of Jul 31, 2026 and WTV as of Jun 30, 2026 | $18.7bn | $2.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.9% | +18.2% |
| Holdings in common | 19% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | 21.5% |
| Below its high | 5.1%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | 4.2%, high on Sep 3, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and WTV hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
19% in common
On the same fields
COWZ and WTV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ in plain words
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
WTV in plain words
WTV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 82% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 123 positions, with the top ten at 21.5%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or WTV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +22.9% and WTV +18.2%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or WTV?
- WTV is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $37. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, COWZ against WTV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-wtv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). COWZ against WTV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-wtv
[COWZ against WTV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-wtv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.