IWR vs SCHM: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWR and SCHM hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and SCHM returned +17.6% over the year. Net assets: $57.0bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF, and $14.6bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF.
SCHM costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.5 points; IWR is 3.4 times larger.
| IWR | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025 | $39.1bn | $11.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.1% | +17.6% |
| What it tracks | Russell Midcap Index | Dow Jones U.S. Mid-Cap Total Stock Market Index |
| Holdings in common | 29% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 6.8% | 13.3% |
| Below its high | 4.3%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 5.8%, high on Jun 30, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWR and SCHM hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
29% in common
On the same fields
IWR and SCHM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IWR
IWR tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 62% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 825 positions, with the top ten at 6.8%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +15.1% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
About SCHM
SCHM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +15.9% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 496 positions, with the top ten at 13.3%. It sat 5.8% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWR or SCHM?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWR returned +15.1% and SCHM +17.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IWR or SCHM?
- SCHM is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWR against SCHM, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwr-vs-schm
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). IWR against SCHM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwr-vs-schm
[IWR against SCHM (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwr-vs-schm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.