Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWP vs JSMD: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWP returned −4.9% to JSMD's +6.2%; 10% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWP and JSMD

Net assets: $19.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF, and $1.1bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF.

At a glance
−4.9%
IWP total return, 1 year
+6.2%
JSMD total return, 1 year
0.23%
IWP expense ratio
0.30%
JSMD expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWP costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.1 points.

IWP vs JSMD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWPJSMD
Return
Total return, 1 year−4.9%+6.2%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 17, 202610.9%, high on Jun 30, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell Midcap Growth IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.23%0.30%
Net assets, IWP as of Oct 27, 2026 and JSMD as of Jul 31, 2026$19.1bn$1.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common10%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund22.2%16.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 555 weekly returns · each against IWV
IWP JSMD
Return
Total return edge JSMD +218.3% +246.3%
Annualized edge JSMD (slight) +11.5% +12.3%
Price return edge JSMD +197.2% +230.9%
Risk
Volatility edge IWP (slight) 20.9% 21.6%
Max drawdown edge Tie −37.3% −36.8%
Downside capture 111.0% 109.3%
Beta 1.14 1.12
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge JSMD (slight) 0.51 0.54
Sortino edge JSMD (slight) 0.75 0.79
Treynor 0.093 0.104
Calmar edge JSMD (slight) 0.31 0.34
Against the benchmark
Alpha −3.9% a year −2.6% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.71 −0.85
Information ratio −0.27 −0.11
Tracking error 7.8% 10.2%
Reading

JSMD returned more: +246.3% to +218.3%. IWP swung slightly less: 20.9% to 21.6%. IWP and JSMD fell about the same at their worst: −37.3% and −36.8%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWP vs JSMD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWPJSMDIWVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+218.3%+246.3%JSMDPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.5%+12.3%JSMD (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+197.2%+230.9%JSMDPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.9%21.6%IWP (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.3%14.6%IWP (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−37.3%−36.8%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture113.0%111.8%100.0%TieShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture111.0%109.3%100.0%TieShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.141.121.00JSMD lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.870.781.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.510.54JSMD (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.750.79JSMD (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0930.1040.127JSMDReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.310.34JSMD (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWVIWVIWVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−3.9% a year−2.6% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.71−0.85Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−8.4% to +0.6%−8.7% to +3.4%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.27−0.11JSMDReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.8%10.2%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 555 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

10%

By the books each fund has filed, IWP and JSMD hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

10% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWP JSMD
ATI 0.66% 0.82%
AFFIRM HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.60% 1.20%
GUARDANT HEALTH 0.60% 1.02%
WOODWARD 0.53% 1.09%
MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS 0.51% 0.81%
HALOZYME THERAPEUTICS 0.45% 1.18%
MEDPACE HOLDINGS 0.45% 1.63%
LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR 0.43% 0.69%
RUBRIK CLASS A 0.42% 0.62%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY 0.41% 1.11%
GODADDY CLASS A 0.39% 0.79%
NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES 0.37% 1.05%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWP
SNOWFLAKE 3.34%
CLOUDFLARE CLASS A 3.09%
DATADOG INC CLASS A 2.72%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP REIT INC 2.00%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS 1.98%
MARATHON PETROLEUM 1.93%
TARGA RESOURCES 1.90%
CENCORA 1.79%
Only in JSMD
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. 2.05%
Piper Sandler Cos. 1.59%
Commvault Systems, Inc. 1.58%
Enova International, Inc. 1.57%
StepStone Group, Inc. 1.45%
TriNet Group, Inc. 1.35%
Liquidia Corp. 1.26%
Qualys, Inc. 1.22%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −4.9% +6.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (IWV) +13.3% (IWV)
Gap to its benchmark −18.2 pts vs IWV −7.1 pts vs IWV
Expense ratio 0.23% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 49.1% 2.5%
Holdings 274 126
Net assets, IWP as of Oct 27, 2026 and JSMD as of Jul 31, 2026 $19.1bn $1.1bn

IWP and JSMD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-CDB7C96610

IWP and JSMD are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IWP follows Russell Midcap Growth Index and JSMD follows No index, actively managed.
  2. Holdings in common. 10% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWP returned −4.9% and JSMD +6.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWP

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −4.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

IWP tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 49% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 274 positions, with the top ten at 22.2%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

JSMD

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

JSMD is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 10.9% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWP or JSMD?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWP returned −4.9% and JSMD +6.2%.
Which is cheaper, IWP or JSMD?
IWP is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWP and JSMD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 49% of IWP and 2% of JSMD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWP against JSMD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwp-vs-jsmd

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.