Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ILCG vs IWP: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ILCG returned +6.4% to IWP's −4.9%; 9% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ILCG and IWP
Net assets: $3.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF, and $19.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
ILCG costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.3 points; IWP is 6.1 times larger.
| Measure | ILCG | IWP |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +6.4% | −4.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 7.6%, high on Aug 17, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index | Russell Midcap Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.23% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $3.1bn | $18.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 9% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 50.1% | 22.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jul 9, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,163 weekly returnsILCG returned more: +1,029.7% to +746.6%. ILCG swung slightly less: 18.9% to 20.7%. ILCG fell slightly less at its worst: −51.3% to −56.3%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | ILCG | IWP | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +1,029.7% | +746.6% | ILCG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +11.4% | +10.0% | ILCG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +851.7% | +614.4% | ILCG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 18.9% | 20.7% | ILCG (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.0% | 14.5% | ILCG (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −51.3% | −56.3% | ILCG (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.57 | 0.48 | ILCG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.83 | 0.68 | ILCG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.22 | 0.18 | ILCG | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,163 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ILCG and IWP hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
9% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ILCG and IWP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ILCG and IWP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. ILCG follows Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index and IWP follows Russell Midcap Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 9% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 ILCG returned +6.4% and IWP −4.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.3 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
ILCG
ILCG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 325 positions, with the top ten at 50.1%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −4.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
IWP tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 49% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 274 positions, with the top ten at 22.2%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ILCG or IWP?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILCG returned +6.4% and IWP −4.9%.
- Which is cheaper, ILCG or IWP?
- ILCG is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ILCG against IWP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilcg-vs-iwp
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ILCG against IWP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilcg-vs-iwp
[ILCG against IWP (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilcg-vs-iwp)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.