Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ILCG vs JSMD: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ILCG returned +6.4% to JSMD's +6.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ILCG and JSMD
Net assets: $3.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Morningstar Growth ETF, and $1.1bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF.
Pair scorecard
ILCG costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points.
| Measure | ILCG | JSMD |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +6.4% | +6.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 10.9%, high on Jun 30, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.30% |
| Net assets, ILCG as of Oct 28, 2026 and JSMD as of Jul 31, 2026 | $3.1bn | $1.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 50.1% | 16.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Mar 4, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 555 weekly returnsILCG returned more: +421.7% to +246.3%. ILCG swung slightly less: 19.9% to 21.6%. ILCG fell slightly less at its worst: −35.4% to −36.8%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | ILCG | JSMD | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +421.7% | +246.3% | ILCG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +16.7% | +12.3% | ILCG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +387.3% | +230.9% | ILCG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 19.9% | 21.6% | ILCG (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.2% | 14.6% | ILCG (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −35.4% | −36.8% | ILCG (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.76 | 0.54 | ILCG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.14 | 0.79 | ILCG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.47 | 0.34 | ILCG | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 555 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ILCG and JSMD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ILCG and JSMD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ILCG and JSMD are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. ILCG follows Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index and JSMD follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
- Cost. ILCG charges 0.04% of assets a year and JSMD 0.30%, a gap of 0.26 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
ILCG
ILCG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 325 positions, with the top ten at 50.1%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
JSMD is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 10.9% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ILCG or JSMD?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILCG returned +6.4% and JSMD +6.2%.
- Which is cheaper, ILCG or JSMD?
- ILCG is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ILCG against JSMD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilcg-vs-jsmd
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ILCG against JSMD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilcg-vs-jsmd
[ILCG against JSMD (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilcg-vs-jsmd)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.