Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FPX vs IWP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FPX returned +2.9% to IWP's −4.9%; 7% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FPX and IWP

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.4bn for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF and $19.1bn for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+2.9%
FPX total return, 1 year
−4.9%
IWP total return, 1 year
0.57%
FPX expense ratio
0.23%
IWP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWP costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.8 points; IWP is 13.6 times larger.

FPX vs IWP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFPXIWP
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.9%−4.9%
Drawdown
Below its high15.9%, high on Jun 30, 20267.6%, high on Aug 17, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksIPOX -100 U.S. IndexRussell Midcap Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.23%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$1.4bn$19.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common7%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.4%22.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 2, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,064 weekly returns
FPX IWP
Return
Total return edge FPX +899.9% +536.0%
Annualized edge FPX +11.9% +9.5%
Price return edge FPX +766.5% +441.3%
Risk
Volatility edge IWP (slight) 22.7% 21.3%
Max drawdown edge Tie −55.6% −56.3%
Downside capture 108.8% 107.8%
Beta 1.13 1.13
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FPX 0.54 0.45
Sortino edge FPX 0.76 0.65
Treynor 0.108 0.081
Calmar edge FPX 0.21 0.17
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.4% a year −0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.17 −0.63
Information ratio 0.16 0.04
Tracking error 11.1% 6.9%

Each against its own benchmark: FPX against IVV, Jun 2, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026; IWP against IWV, Aug 10, 2001 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FPX returned more: +899.9% to +536.0%. IWP swung slightly less: 21.3% to 22.7%. FPX and IWP fell about the same at their worst: −55.6% and −56.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FPX vs IWP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFPXIWPEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+899.9%+536.0%FPXPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.9%+9.5%FPXTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+766.5%+441.3%FPXPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.7%21.3%IWP (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.0%14.9%IWP (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−55.6%−56.3%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture122.3%117.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture108.8%107.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.131.13Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.770.90Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.540.45FPXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.760.65FPXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1080.081Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.210.17FPXAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIVVIWVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.4% a year−0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.17−0.63Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.3% to +5.1%−3.4% to +1.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.160.04Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.1%6.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,064 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

7%

By the books each fund has filed, FPX and IWP hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

7% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FPX IWP
Lumentum Holdings Inc. 2.67% 1.98%
Revolution Medicines, Inc. 1.19% 1.05%
CoreWeave, Inc. (Class A) 0.76% 0.55%
Reddit, Inc. (Class A) 0.90% 0.55%
Rubrik, Inc. (Class A) 0.82% 0.42%
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. 0.62% 0.33%
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. 0.72% 0.31%
AST SpaceMobile, Inc. 0.37% 0.30%
Corpay, Inc. 2.09% 0.27%
Solstice Advanced Materials Inc. 0.23% 0.30%
Twilio Inc. (Class A) 2.01% 0.16%
Maplebear Inc. (Instacart) 0.95% 0.13%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FPX
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (Class A) 9.24%
Eli Lilly and Company 8.28%
GE Vernova Inc. 7.36%
Sandisk Corporation 5.46%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc 4.17%
HF Sinclair Corp. 3.25%
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 1.89%
Honeywell Aerospace Inc. 1.75%
Only in IWP
SNOWFLAKE 3.34%
CLOUDFLARE CLASS A 3.09%
DATADOG INC CLASS A 2.72%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP REIT INC 2.00%
MARATHON PETROLEUM 1.93%
TARGA RESOURCES 1.90%
CENCORA 1.79%
ROBINHOOD MARKETS CLASS A 1.78%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +2.9% −4.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (IVV) +13.3% (IWV)
Gap to its benchmark −10.8 pts vs IVV −18.2 pts vs IWV
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.23%
Already in the S&P 500 50.6% 49.1%
Holdings 99 274
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.4bn $19.1bn

FPX and IWP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-7F89C7F2FD

FPX and IWP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FPX follows IPOX -100 U.S. Index and IWP follows Russell Midcap Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 7% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FPX returned +2.9% and IWP −4.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FPX and IWP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FPX

FPX tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 51% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 46.4%. It sat 15.9% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWP

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −4.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

IWP tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 49% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 274 positions, with the top ten at 22.2%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FPX or IWP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FPX returned +2.9% and IWP −4.9%.
Which is cheaper, FPX or IWP?
IWP is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FPX and IWP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 51% of FPX and 49% of IWP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FPX against IWP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fpx-vs-iwp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.