Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWO vs MUB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWO returned +7.9% to MUB's −0.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWO and MUB

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $14.0bn for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF and $54.1bn for iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

At a glance
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
−0.4%
MUB total return, 1 year
0.24%
IWO expense ratio
0.05%
MUB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MUB costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.3 points; MUB is 3.9 times larger.

IWO vs MUB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOMUB
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.9%−0.4%
Drawdown
Below its high9.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 Growth IndexICE AMT-Free US National Municipal Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.24%0.05%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$14.0bn$54.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWO MUB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWO
JFROG 0.74%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
GLAUKOS 0.70%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58%
Only in MUB
UNIVERSITY TEX UNIV REVS 0.16%
SAN ANTONIO TEX WTR REV 0.13%
NEW YORK ST TWY AUTH ST PERS I 0.12%
NORTHWEST TEX INDPT SCH DIST 0.12%
OKLAHOMA TRANSN AUTH OK F/K/A 0.12%
HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.11%
NEW JERSEY ST 0.11%
OHIO ST UNIV GEN RCPTS 0.11%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Tracks an index of National Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year +7.9% −0.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +8.0% (VTWG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTWG not measured
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.05%
Holdings 1122 7873
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $14.0bn $54.1bn

IWO and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWO and MUB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MUB

MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or MUB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and MUB −0.4%.
Which is cheaper, IWO or MUB?
MUB is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWO against MUB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-mub

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.