Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MUB vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MUB returned −0.4% to ONEQ's +12.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MUB and ONEQ
Net assets: $54.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares National Muni Bond ETF, and $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
MUB costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.1 points; MUB is 4.3 times larger.
| Measure | MUB | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −0.4% | +12.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | ICE AMT-Free US National Municipal Index | Nasdaq Composite Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.21% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $46.6bn | $10.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 85% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 56.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Sep 21, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 996 weekly returnsONEQ returned more: +1,076.3% to +76.1%. MUB swung less: 6.5% to 20.4%. MUB fell less at its worst: −12.4% to −53.5%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MUB | ONEQ | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +76.1% | +1,076.3% | ONEQ | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +3.0% | +13.7% | ONEQ | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +3.4% | +875.0% | ONEQ | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 6.5% | 20.4% | MUB | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 4.7% | 14.1% | MUB | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −12.4% | −53.5% | MUB | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.26 | 0.66 | ONEQ | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.36 | 0.96 | ONEQ | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.24 | 0.26 | ONEQ (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 996 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MUB and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MUB and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MUB and ONEQ do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. MUB follows ICE AMT-Free US National Municipal Index and ONEQ follows Nasdaq Composite Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MUB returned −0.4% and ONEQ +12.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 13.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MUB
MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.
ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MUB or ONEQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned −0.4% and ONEQ +12.7%.
- Which is cheaper, MUB or ONEQ?
- MUB is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MUB against ONEQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-oneq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MUB against ONEQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-oneq
[MUB against ONEQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-oneq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.