Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

COWZ vs MUB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to MUB's −0.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COWZ and MUB

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.5bn for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and $54.1bn for iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

At a glance
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
−0.4%
MUB total return, 1 year
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio
0.05%
MUB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MUB costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.8 points; MUB is 2.8 times larger.

COWZ vs MUB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOWZMUB
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.4%−0.4%
Benchmark
What it tracksPacer US Cash Cows 100 IndexICE AMT-Free US National Municipal Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.05%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$19.5bn$54.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COWZ MUB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Only in MUB
UNIVERSITY TEX UNIV REVS 0.16%
SAN ANTONIO TEX WTR REV 0.13%
NEW YORK ST TWY AUTH ST PERS I 0.12%
NORTHWEST TEX INDPT SCH DIST 0.12%
OKLAHOMA TRANSN AUTH OK F/K/A 0.12%
HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.11%
NEW JERSEY ST 0.11%
OHIO ST UNIV GEN RCPTS 0.11%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Pacer iShares
What it is Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100 Tracks an index of National Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year +24.4% −0.4%
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.05%
Holdings 100 7873
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $19.5bn $54.1bn

COWZ and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ and MUB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

MUB

MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or MUB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and MUB −0.4%.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or MUB?
MUB is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COWZ against MUB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-mub

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.