Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs COWZ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to COWZ's +24.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and COWZ

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $139.4bn for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and $19.5bn for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
AGG total return, 1 year
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.8 points; AGG is 7.1 times larger.

AGG vs COWZ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGCOWZ
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+24.4%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond IndexPacer US Cash Cows 100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.49%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$139.4bn$19.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and COWZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AGG COWZ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AGG
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 3.02%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares Pacer
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +24.4%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.49%
Holdings 13469 100
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $139.4bn $19.5bn

AGG and COWZ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG and COWZ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or COWZ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and COWZ +24.4%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or COWZ?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against COWZ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-cowz

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.