Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BNDX vs COWZ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BNDX returned −0.9% to COWZ's +24.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BNDX and COWZ

Net assets: $82.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF, and $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF.

At a glance
−0.9%
BNDX total return, 1 year
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
0.07%
BNDX expense ratio
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BNDX costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.3 points.

BNDX vs COWZ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDXCOWZ
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.9%+24.4%
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged)Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.07%0.49%
Net assets, BNDX as of Sep 30, 2026 and COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026$82.9bn$19.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BNDX and COWZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BNDX COWZ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BNDX
MKTLIQ 0.93%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.39%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.35%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.35%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.35%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.34%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.33%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.31%
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Total International Bond Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100
Total return, 1 year −0.9% +24.4%
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.49%
Holdings 6840 100
Net assets, BNDX as of Sep 30, 2026 and COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 $82.9bn $19.5bn

BNDX and COWZ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BNDX

BNDX tracks an index of Total International Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BNDX or COWZ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNDX returned −0.9% and COWZ +24.4%.
Which is cheaper, BNDX or COWZ?
BNDX is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BNDX against COWZ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bndx-vs-cowz

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.