Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

COWZ vs VCSH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to VCSH's +1.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COWZ and VCSH

Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $43.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
+1.3%
VCSH total return, 1 year
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio
0.03%
VCSH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VCSH costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.1 points.

COWZ vs VCSH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOWZVCSH
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.4%+1.3%
Benchmark
What it tracksPacer US Cash Cows 100 IndexBloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.03%
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and VCSH as of Sep 30, 2026$19.5bn$43.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and VCSH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COWZ VCSH
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Only in VCSH
MKTLIQ 0.68%
Bank of America Corp 0.23%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.22%
CVS Health Corp 0.20%
AbbVie Inc 0.20%
Amazon.com Inc 0.19%
Boeing Co 0.19%
T-Mobile USA Inc 0.19%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100 Tracks an index of Short-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year +24.4% +1.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +1.3% (SCHJ)
Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs SCHJ
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.03%
Holdings 100 3064
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and VCSH as of Sep 30, 2026 $19.5bn $43.9bn

COWZ and VCSH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

VCSH

VCSH tracks an index of Short-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against +1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or VCSH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and VCSH +1.3%.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or VCSH?
VCSH is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COWZ against VCSH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-vcsh

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.