Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BSV vs COWZ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BSV returned +1.0% to COWZ's +24.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BSV and COWZ

Net assets: $45.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF, and $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF.

At a glance
+1.0%
BSV total return, 1 year
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
0.03%
BSV expense ratio
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BSV costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.4 points.

BSV vs COWZ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBSVCOWZ
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.0%+24.4%
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted IndexPacer US Cash Cows 100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.49%
Net assets, BSV as of Sep 30, 2026 and COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026$45.4bn$19.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and COWZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BSV COWZ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BSV
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.70%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.32%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.09%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.86%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.86%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.83%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.83%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Short-Term Bond Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100
Total return, 1 year +1.0% +24.4%
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.49%
Holdings 3157 100
Net assets, BSV as of Sep 30, 2026 and COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 $45.4bn $19.5bn

BSV and COWZ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BSV

BSV tracks an index of Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or COWZ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.0% and COWZ +24.4%.
Which is cheaper, BSV or COWZ?
BSV is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSV against COWZ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-cowz

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.