Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

COWZ vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to MBB's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COWZ and MBB

Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $35.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MBS ETF.

At a glance
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio
0.04%
MBB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.2 points; MBB is 1.8 times larger.

COWZ vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOWZMBB
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.4%−0.8%
Benchmark
What it tracksPacer US Cash Cows 100 IndexBloomberg U.S. MBS Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.04%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$19.7bn$35.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and MBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COWZ MBB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF MBB iShares MBS ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Pacer iShares
What it is Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100 Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities
Total return, 1 year +24.4% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.1% (SPMB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.3 pts vs SPMB
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.04%
Holdings 100 10813
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and MBB as of Oct 28, 2026 $19.5bn $35.5bn

COWZ and MBB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ and MBB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or MBB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and MBB −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or MBB?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COWZ against MBB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-mbb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.