Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or LQD?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and LQD returned −2.7%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, COWZ or LQD?

COWZ charges 0.49% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs LQD: how they differ

COWZ and LQD hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and LQD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZ	Only in LQD
QUALCOMM Inc 2.67%	BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%
Altria Group Inc 2.21%	ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%	DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%
CVS Health Corp 2.16%	CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%	JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%
Ford Motor Co 2.01%	BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%	MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%	CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

COWZ and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Pacer	iShares
What it is	US Cash Cows 100	US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year	+23.4%	−2.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5.9 pts	−20.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.49%	0.14%
Holdings	100	3149

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or LQD?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and LQD returned −2.7%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or LQD?: COWZ charges 0.49% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against LQD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against LQD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-lqd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources