Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VOE?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and VOE returned +20.2%, so VOE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, LQD or VOE?

LQD charges 0.14% a year and VOE charges 0.05%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LQD vs VOE: how they differ

LQD and VOE hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VOE returned more over the year.

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LQD and VOE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in LQD	Only in VOE
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%	Cummins Inc 1.71%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%	Valero Energy Corp 1.34%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%	Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.29%
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%	CRH PLC 1.24%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%	United Rentals Inc 1.23%
BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%	General Motors Co 1.21%
MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%	SLB Ltd 1.21%
CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%	Simon Property Group Inc 1.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

LQD and VOE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	US investment grade bonds	Mid-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year	−2.7%	+20.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−20.2 pts	+2.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.05%
Holdings	3149	170

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VOE?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and VOE returned +20.2%, so VOE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, LQD or VOE?: LQD charges 0.14% a year and VOE charges 0.05%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQD against VOE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQD against VOE, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-voe Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources