Which returned more over the last year, LQD or NOBL?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so NOBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, LQD or NOBL?

LQD charges 0.14% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LQD vs NOBL: how they differ

LQD and NOBL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and NOBL returned more over the year.

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LQD and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in LQD	Only in NOBL
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%	INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.72%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%	BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.69%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%	ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.69%
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%	ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.68%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%	TARGET CORP 1.64%
BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%	CHEVRON CORP 1.61%
MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%	GENUINE PARTS CO 1.61%
CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%	MEDTRONIC PLC 1.61%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

LQD and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	ProShares
What it is	US investment grade bonds	S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year	−2.7%	+9.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−20.2 pts	−8.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.35%
Holdings	3149	69

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

NOBL in plain words

NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 11, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or NOBL?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so NOBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, LQD or NOBL?: LQD charges 0.14% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQD against NOBL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQD against NOBL, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-nobl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources