Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MBB vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MBB returned −0.8% to NOBL's +15.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MBB and NOBL

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $35.5bn for iShares MBS ETF and $11.6bn for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

At a glance
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
+15.5%
NOBL total return, 1 year
0.04%
MBB expense ratio
0.35%
NOBL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.3 points; MBB is 3.1 times larger.

MBB vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMBBNOBL
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.8%+15.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. MBS IndexS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.04%0.35%
Net assets$35.5bn$11.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight98%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund17.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 18, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 679 weekly returns
MBB NOBL
Return
Total return edge NOBL +22.3% +264.8%
Annualized edge NOBL +1.6% +10.4%
Price return edge NOBL −14.0% +179.1%
Risk
Volatility edge MBB 4.4% 15.4%
Max drawdown edge MBB −17.4% −31.7%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge NOBL −0.07 0.59
Sortino edge NOBL −0.10 0.84
Calmar edge NOBL 0.09 0.33
Reading

NOBL returned more: +264.8% to +22.3%. MBB swung less: 4.4% to 15.4%. MBB fell less at its worst: −17.4% to −31.7%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MBB vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMBBNOBLEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+22.3%+264.8%NOBLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+1.6%+10.4%NOBLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−14.0%+179.1%NOBLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility4.4%15.4%MBBSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.1%10.8%MBBLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−17.4%−31.7%MBBDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.070.59NOBLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.100.84NOBLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.090.33NOBLAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 679 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MBB and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MBB NOBL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Only in NOBL
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.81%
BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.78%
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC 1.77%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.70%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 1.69%
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 1.67%
CHEVRON CORP 1.66%
ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.64%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MBB iShares MBS ETF NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year −0.8% +15.5%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.1% (SPMB) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs SPMB not measured
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.35%
Holdings 10813 69
Net assets $35.5bn $11.6bn

MBB and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-A00ECB9C35

MBB and NOBL do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. MBB follows Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index and NOBL follows S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MBB returned −0.8% and NOBL +15.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 16.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MBB and NOBL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

NOBL

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MBB or NOBL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.8% and NOBL +15.5%.
Which is cheaper, MBB or NOBL?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MBB against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mbb-vs-nobl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.