Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or USFR?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +9.4% and USFR returned +4.1%, so NOBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, NOBL or USFR?

NOBL charges 0.35% a year and USFR charges 0.15%, so USFR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

NOBL vs USFR: how they differ

NOBL and USFR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and NOBL returned more over the year.

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NOBL and USFR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in NOBL	Only in USFR
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.72%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.04%
BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.69%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.01%
ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.69%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.00%
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.68%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 15.95%
TARGET CORP 1.64%
CHEVRON CORP 1.61%
GENUINE PARTS CO 1.61%
MEDTRONIC PLC 1.61%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

NOBL and USFR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	ProShares	WisdomTree
What it is	S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats	Floating Rate Treasury
Total return, 1 year	+9.4%	+4.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−8.1 pts	−13.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.35%	0.15%
Holdings	69	4

NOBL in plain words

NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 11, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

USFR in plain words

USFR is a bond fund tracking the Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or USFR?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +9.4% and USFR returned +4.1%, so NOBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, NOBL or USFR?: NOBL charges 0.35% a year and USFR charges 0.15%, so USFR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NOBL against USFR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NOBL against USFR, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nobl-vs-usfr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources