Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BND vs COWZ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BND returned −1.3% to COWZ's +24.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BND and COWZ
Net assets: $161.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF.
Pair scorecard
BND costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.7 points.
| Measure | BND | COWZ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.3% | +24.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Aug 6, 2020 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.49% |
| Net assets, BND as of Sep 30, 2026 and COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 | $161.4bn | $19.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 95% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BND and COWZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BND and COWZ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BND
BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
COWZ
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BND or COWZ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −1.3% and COWZ +24.4%.
- Which is cheaper, BND or COWZ?
- BND is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BND against COWZ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-cowz
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BND against COWZ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-cowz
[BND against COWZ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-cowz)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.