Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BINC vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BINC returned +0.5% to IWO's +7.9%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BINC and IWONet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $16.8bn for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and $14.0bn for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWO costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.4 points; BINC is 1.2 times larger.
| Measure | BINC | IWO |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.5% | +7.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 9.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Russell 2000 Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.24% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $16.8bn | $14.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 1% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.6% | 6.4% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BINC and IWO hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
1% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BINC and IWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BINC
BINC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4,690 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.
IWO
IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or IWO?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and IWO +7.9%.
- Which is cheaper, BINC or IWO?
- IWO is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BINC against IWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-iwo
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BINC against IWO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-iwo
[BINC against IWO (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-iwo)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.