Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWM vs JAAA: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWM returned +14.1% to JAAA's +4.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWM and JAAA
Net assets: $75.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 ETF, and $32.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWM costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.4 points; IWM is 2.3 times larger.
| Measure | IWM | JAAA |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.1% | +4.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 2000 Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.20% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $75.5bn | $32.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 3.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 30, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 312 weekly returnsIWM returned more: +93.5% to +31.1%. JAAA swung less: 1.3% to 21.1%. JAAA fell less at its worst: −2.5% to −31.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IWM | JAAA | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +93.5% | +31.1% | IWM | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +11.6% | +4.6% | IWM | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +80.1% | +1.6% | IWM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 21.1% | 1.3% | JAAA | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.1% | 1.0% | JAAA | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −31.2% | −2.5% | JAAA | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.47 | 0.93 | JAAA | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.71 | 1.24 | JAAA | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.37 | 1.82 | JAAA | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 312 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWM and JAAA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWM and JAAA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWM and JAAA do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IWM follows Russell 2000 Index and JAAA follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWM returned +14.1% and JAAA +4.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IWM
IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
JAAA
JAAA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWM or JAAA?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +14.1% and JAAA +4.7%.
- Which is cheaper, IWM or JAAA?
- IWM is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWM against JAAA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-jaaa
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWM against JAAA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-jaaa
[IWM against JAAA (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-jaaa)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.