Which returned more over the last year, BIL or IWM?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and IWM returned +21.2%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BIL or IWM?

BIL charges 0.14% a year and IWM charges 0.19%, so BIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BIL vs IWM: how they differ

BIL is a short-term Treasury fund and IWM an equity index fund, and over the year IWM returned more, +21.2% against +3.7%.

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

BIL and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	State Street	iShares
What it is	1-3 month T-bills	Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year	+3.7%	+21.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.8 pts	+3.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.19%
Holdings	not filed	1749

BIL in plain words

BIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

IWM in plain words

IWM is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1749 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BIL or IWM?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and IWM returned +21.2%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BIL or IWM?: BIL charges 0.14% a year and IWM charges 0.19%, so BIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BIL against IWM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BIL against IWM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-iwm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources