Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMB vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMB returned −0.4% to IWM's +14.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMB and IWM

Net assets: $13.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF, and $75.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
−0.4%
EMB total return, 1 year
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
0.39%
EMB expense ratio
0.19%
IWM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWM costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.5 points; IWM is 5.7 times larger.

EMB vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMBIWM
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.4%+14.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Jun 29, 20267.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksJ.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core IndexRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.19%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$13.2bn$75.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and IWM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMB IWM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMB
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 1.08%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.76%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.65%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.64%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.56%
URUGUAY (ORIENTAL REPUBLIC OF) 0.54%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.52%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.52%
Only in IWM
JFROG 0.37%
GLAUKOS 0.35%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.35%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.34%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.33%
UMB FINANCIAL 0.33%
SM ENERGY 0.32%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year −0.4% +14.1%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.3% (VTWO)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.2 pts vs VTWO
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.19%
Holdings 622 1977
Net assets, EMB as of Oct 28, 2026 and IWM as of Oct 27, 2026 $13.2bn $75.5bn

EMB and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EMB and IWM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMB

EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or IWM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned −0.4% and IWM +14.1%.
Which is cheaper, EMB or IWM?
IWM is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMB against IWM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-iwm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.