Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMB vs VB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMB returned −0.4% to VB's +14.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMB and VB

Net assets: $13.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF, and $76.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF.

At a glance
−0.4%
EMB total return, 1 year
+14.4%
VB total return, 1 year
0.39%
EMB expense ratio
0.03%
VB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VB costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.8 points; VB is 6.0 times larger.

EMB vs VB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMBVB
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.4%+14.4%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Jun 29, 20265.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksJ.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core IndexMorningstar US Small Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$12.9bn$76.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight22%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 28, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 982 weekly returns
EMB VB
Return
Total return edge VB +126.2% +454.5%
Annualized edge VB +4.4% +9.5%
Price return edge VB −9.4% +320.6%
Risk
Volatility edge EMB 11.3% 22.5%
Max drawdown edge EMB −32.0% −54.5%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VB 0.31 0.45
Sortino edge VB 0.42 0.64
Calmar edge VB 0.14 0.17
Reading

VB returned more: +454.5% to +126.2%. EMB swung less: 11.3% to 22.5%. EMB fell less at its worst: −32.0% to −54.5%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EMB vs VB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMBVBEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+126.2%+454.5%VBPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+4.4%+9.5%VBTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−9.4%+320.6%VBPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility11.3%22.5%EMBSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation8.4%15.8%EMBLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−32.0%−54.5%EMBDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.310.45VBReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.420.64VBReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.140.17VBAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 982 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and VB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMB VB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMB
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 1.08%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.76%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.65%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.64%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.56%
URUGUAY (ORIENTAL REPUBLIC OF) 0.54%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.52%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.52%
Only in VB
SLCMT1142 1.31%
Natera Inc 0.72%
Twilio Inc 0.57%
Revolution Medicines Inc 0.53%
Everpure Inc 0.52%
Illumina Inc 0.52%
Okta Inc 0.44%
Moderna Inc 0.44%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond Tracks an index of Small-Cap
Total return, 1 year −0.4% +14.4%
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.03%
Holdings 622 1303
Net assets, EMB as of Oct 28, 2026 and VB as of Sep 30, 2026 $13.2bn $76.9bn

EMB and VB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-0ADBE3CF6C

EMB and VB do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EMB follows J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index and VB follows Morningstar US Small Cap Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EMB returned −0.4% and VB +14.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 14.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EMB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMB

EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VB

VB tracks an index of Small-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,303 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or VB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned −0.4% and VB +14.4%.
Which is cheaper, EMB or VB?
VB is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMB against VB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-vb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.