Which returned more over the last year, BINC or IWM?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and IWM +14.1%.

Which is cheaper, BINC or IWM?

IWM is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do BINC and IWM overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 0% of BINC and 0% of IWM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

BINC vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BINC returned +0.5% to IWM's +14.1%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BINC and IWM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $16.8bn for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

BINC on its own →IWM on its own →

At a glance

+0.5%

BINC total return, 1 year

+14.1%

IWM total return, 1 year

0.40%

BINC expense ratio

0.19%

IWM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWM costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.6 points; IWM is 4.5 times larger.

BINC vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	BINC	IWM
Return
Measure	BINC	IWM
Total return, 1 year	+0.5%	+14.1%
Drawdown
Measure	BINC	IWM
Below its high		7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	BINC	IWM
What it tracks	No index, actively managed	Russell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Measure	BINC	IWM
Expense ratio	0.40%	0.19%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$16.8bn	$75.5bn
Holdings
Measure	BINC	IWM
Holdings in common	1%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	24.6%	3.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, BINC and IWM hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

1% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BINC IWM

PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES INC 144A 0.05% 0.06%

CHEMOURS COMPANY 144A 0.04% 0.07%

COMSTOCK RESOURCES INC 144A 0.04% 0.04%

CORE SCIENTIFIC FINANCE I LLC 144A 0.04% 0.15%

SM ENERGY CO 144A 0.04% 0.32%

ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP INC. RegS 0.03% 0.07%

GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY (TH 0.03% 0.04%

HERC HOLDINGS INC 144A 0.03% 0.18%

LGI HOMES INC 144A 0.03% 0.03%

MERLIN MAZECO TL-B 0.03% 0.04%

NEWELL BRANDS INC 144A 0.03% 0.08%

OWENS-BROCKWAY GLASS CONTAINER INC 144A 0.03% 0.03%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in BINC

BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.80%

UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 4.50%

TREASURY NOTE (2OLD) 4.34%

UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 2.91%

UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 2.21%

CASH COLLATERAL MORGAN STANLEY & C 1.68%

ISHARES IBOXX $ INV GRADE CORPORAT 0.99%

EUR/USD 0.83%

Only in IWM

JFROG 0.37%

GLAUKOS 0.35%

TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.35%

MOOG INC CLASS A 0.34%

BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.33%

UMB FINANCIAL 0.33%

10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.31%

BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.29%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares iShares

What it is Actively managed Tracks the Russell 2000

Total return, 1 year +0.5% +14.1%

Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.3% (VTWO)

Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.2 pts vs VTWO

Expense ratio 0.40% 0.19%

Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 4690 1977

Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $16.8bn $75.5bn

BINC and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

BINC

BINC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4,690 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BINC or IWM?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and IWM +14.1%.
Which is cheaper, BINC or IWM?: IWM is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do BINC and IWM overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 0% of BINC and 0% of IWM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

BINC vs IWC BINC vs VB BINC vs IJR BINC vs IJT IEI vs IWM IWM vs SCHP HYG vs IWM IWM vs TIP

Where to next

BINC on its own →IWM on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →BINC dividend history →BINC holdings →IWM dividend history →IWM holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

BINC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

BINC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for BINC ↗

IWM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

IWM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for IWM ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BINC against IWM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-iwm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.