IWB vs USXF: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWB and USXF hold 38% of their weight in the same names, and USXF returned +20.0% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $49.6bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF and $1.5bn for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF.
USXF costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; IWB is far larger, $49.6bn against $1.5bn.
| IWB | USXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.10% |
| Net assets | $49.6bn | $1.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.6% | +20.0% |
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Index | MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index |
| Holdings in common | 38% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 39.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and USXF hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
38% in common
On the same fields
IWB and USXF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB in plain words
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
USXF in plain words
USXF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 283 positions, with the top ten at 39.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or USXF?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and USXF +20.0%.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or USXF?
- USXF is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWB against USXF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-usxf
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IWB against USXF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-usxf
[IWB against USXF (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-usxf)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.