IWB vs QQQE: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWB and QQQE hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and QQQE returned +19.2% over the year. Net assets: $49.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $1.5bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index ETF.
IWB costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.6 points; IWB is far larger, $49.4bn against $1.5bn.
| IWB | QQQE | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $49.4bn | $1.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.6% | +19.2% |
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Index | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 23% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 12.4% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and QQQE hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
23% in common
On the same fields
IWB and QQQE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB in plain words
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
QQQE in plain words
QQQE tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 12.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or QQQE?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and QQQE +19.2%.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or QQQE?
- IWB is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWB against QQQE, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-qqqe
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IWB against QQQE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-qqqe
[IWB against QQQE (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-qqqe)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.