Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWB vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB returned +13.1% to SHV's +3.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWB and SHV

Net assets: $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $21.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+13.1%
IWB total return, 1 year
+3.6%
SHV total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.15%
SHV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.15% a year; their one-year returns differ by 9.5 points; IWB is 2.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

IWB vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWBSHV
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.1%+3.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 IndexICE Short US Treasury Securities Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$48.7bn$22.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and SHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWB SHV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWB
NVIDIA 7.15%
APPLE 7.06%
MICROSOFT 5.56%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.46%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.63%
BROADCOM INC 2.24%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.12%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.92%
Only in SHV
TREASURY BILL 4.98%
TREASURY BILL 4.17%
TREASURY BILL 3.90%
TREASURY BILL 3.72%
TREASURY BILL 3.58%
TREASURY BILL 3.48%
TREASURY BILL 3.35%
TREASURY BILL 3.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year +13.1% +3.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.2% (VONE) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE not measured
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.15%
Holdings 1025 66
Net assets, IWB as of Oct 28, 2026 and SHV as of Oct 27, 2026 $49.1bn $21.7bn

IWB and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWB and SHV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.

SHV

SHV tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or SHV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and SHV +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or SHV?
Neither: IWB and SHV both charge 0.15% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against SHV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-shv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.