Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWB vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB returned +13.1% to MINT's +4.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWB and MINT
Net assets: $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.
Pair scorecard
IWB costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.9 points.
| Measure | IWB | MINT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.1% | +4.2% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.36% |
| Net assets, IWB as of Oct 28, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 | $49.1bn | $16.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 92% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWB and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or MINT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and MINT +4.2%.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or MINT?
- IWB is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWB against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-mint
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWB against MINT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-mint
[IWB against MINT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-mint)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.