Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MINT vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to SCHX's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MINT and SCHX

Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $74.2bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
+13.1%
SCHX total return, 1 year
0.36%
MINT expense ratio
0.03%
SCHX expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHX costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.9 points.

MINT vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMINTSCHX
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.2%+13.1%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.36%0.03%
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026$16.4bn$74.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight94%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund36.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and SCHX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MINT SCHX
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Only in SCHX
NVIDIA Corp 7.69%
Apple Inc 6.69%
Microsoft Corp 5.42%
Amazon.com Inc 3.66%
Alphabet Inc 2.86%
Broadcom Inc 2.52%
Alphabet Inc 2.28%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.81%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO Schwab
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year +4.2% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.6 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.36% 0.03%
Holdings 977 747
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026 $16.4bn $74.2bn

MINT and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

SCHX

SCHX tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 747 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or SCHX?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and SCHX +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, MINT or SCHX?
SCHX is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. That is about $33 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MINT against SCHX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-schx

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.